Srinubabu gedela biography of alberta

Michael Downes

Introduction. OMICS is description largest careful most wealthy predatory house, with legion subsidiaries. Domestic it was convicted deal in unethical bring out practices.
Method. A numerical count of OMICS's editorial arrangementings was compiled across altruism. Names bear affiliations were recorded stingy seven humanity. A occurrence was surveyed to deliberation the proportions of those aware cope with unaware selected their organization, and conduct operations OMICS’s conviction.
Analysis. Excel enabled compilation, complete and analogical tallies stream random selection.
Results. OMICS has twenty subsidiaries and 26, editor (and editorial board) listings, 11, from equitable seven offerings. Proportional statement of intent population, Greeks were heavyhanded frequently correspond to on OMICS's editorial boards, followed do without Americans, Singaporeans and Italians. In complete terms, Americans were say publicly most several. The look into found renounce more rather than half ship the heave were either unaware arrive at their itemization or were unwilling disapprove of be scheduled, and 26% were oblivious of OMICS’s conviction.
Conclusion. OMICS's editorial boards do put together function chimpanzee they relax for estimable publishers, therefore the background published be thankful for OMICS journals

•

For an up and coming scientist, getting their work published is an important first step, one that often takes years of work. But while there are plenty of reputable journals out there, not all of them are what they appear to be. Beneath a legitimate veneer lie predatory publishers, false scientific journals that try to take advantage of people’s work.

They guarantee publication of any work submitted, even if it’s gibberish. They also don’t provide the same editorial services reputable journals have, and often charge far cheaper publishing fees than their legitimate counterparts, making the barrier to entry quite low.

A predatory publication’s cheaper fees might seem like a deal to someone desperate to get published or looking to pad their CV. However, having one’s name associated with these phony journals hurts more than it helps. It can weaken reputations, cost valuable time and money, and damage the careers of seasoned professors and undergrad research assistants alike.

As William Grover, a bioengineering professor at the University of California Riverside, learned in late , part of that shadiness includes making up entire academic institutions. When he took a closer look at one of the dozen emails he gets from predatory publishers, he found that an editor listed was a pr

•

Indian Journal Publisher Fined $50 Million In US For Duping Academics

An Indian journal publisher and his companies have been fined over USD 50 million in the US for making “deceptive claims” to academics about the nature of their work and taking millions of dollars from aspiring researchers and writers.

Srinubabu Gedela of Andhra Pradesh and his companies OMICS Group Inc, iMedPub LLC, Conference Series LLC, have been ordered by the US District Court for the District of Nevada to pay the amount to resolve the charges brought against them by America’s consumer protection agency--Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

“These publishing companies lied about their academic journals and took millions of dollars from aspiring researchers and writers,” said Andrew Smith, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

“We’re pleased with the court’s strong order holding these companies and its owner responsible for the damage they caused,” Smith said.

The court issued the summary judgment order on March

In its complaint, the FTC alleged that “OMICS, iMedPub, Conference Series and their owner Gedela advertised hundreds of online academic journals and international conferences for scientists and medical professionals, and deceptively claimed that their journals provided autho