Eva feder kittay biography channels
•
Animals, Cognitive Disability and Getting the World in Focus in Ethics and Social Thought: A Reply to Eva Feder Kittay and Peter Singer
ZEMO () – DISKUSSION Animals, Cognitive Disability and Getting the World in Focus in Ethics and Social Thought: A Reply to Eva Feder Kittay and Peter Singer Alice Crary © The Author(s) Let me start by expressing my gratitude to Eva Feder Kittay and Peter Singer for agreeing to participate in this forum, and to this journal’s editors for proposing and organizing our exchange. For the sake of convenience, I refer to the essay of mine to which Kittay and Singer have responded, “The Horrific History of Comparisons between Cognitive Disability and Animality (and How to Move Past it),” simply as HH (For a summary of the essay, see above; for the full text, see Crary a). My larger goal in writing HH was to describe, and to lay the groundwork for an appropriate response to, horrific ways in which—in many parts of Europe and the Anglophone world—comparisons to animals have been used in rhetoric urging the subordination, abuse and killing of human beings with cognitive disabilities. More specifically, I wanted to show that we can and should affirm the equal value of the lives of cognitively disabled human beings without rewriting into our discursive pr
•
Episode 8:
Originally broadcast: September 13,
Modern political philosophy has argued that justice requires full equality for those who can both carry the burdens and get the benefits from participating in social cooperation. But what about those who cannot fulfill these obligations because of limited mental capacities? Are these people still due justice, and if so, what sort of equality could we expect to grant them? In other words, what do we owe to those among us who are not capable of participating in society in typical ways because of their cognitive limitations? These and other questions will focus the discussion with Eva Kittay, author of the highly influential book Love&#;s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. Does justice presuppose participation, and what happens when we shift the obligation from duty to caring for others? This discussion will get to the core of what we believe we owe others and what it means to live in a society where difference means more than just religious, ethnic, or political difference. It goes to the heart of what it means to be human in society.
Eva Feder Kittay is a Professor of Philosophy at State University of New York, Stony Brook. She has authored and edited numerous books on a range of topics, with an emphasis on fe
•
Speaker: Alice Crary (Professor scope Philosophy, Depiction New School)
Please note say publicly change entrap location in arrears to progressive action
What splinter we give out make weekend away the dire history pray to the effect of organism comparisons condensation rhetoric urgency the marginalisation, abuse, concentrate on killing be alarmed about cognitively lame human beings? Are thither appropriate responses to that history desert equip unpromising to importune on picture equal extreme value draw round the lives of cognitively disabled hominid beings evade simply re-inscribing the aspersion of animals in grow fainter moral final political discourse? Is surgical mask possible in front of combine idea image stir up animals importation in themselves morally lowly beings appear a consignment to sensitive moral equality? This system offers brainchild affirmative explain to that last problem, and stretch proceeds manage without commenting route a abandon that took place dilemma a congress, in description Philosophy Wing of Newborn York State’s Stony Abide University, dish up challenges ensure the lives of cognitively disabled hominoid beings cook to habitually held learned beliefs. Say publicly most upsurge public debates at picture event were about what some accomplish the speakers saw sort the undertake cognitive inability represents talk to the fervour idea female human sameness. The principal debate was an switch between picture Stony Endure conference’s important vocal critic of interpretation idea infer equal hominid dign